What rights were confirmed by Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

The landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established critical rights related to self-incrimination and legal representation during police interrogations. The ruling emphasized that individuals in custody must be informed of their rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments before any questioning can proceed. This includes the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, ensuring that individuals are aware of these protections to prevent coercive interrogation practices and safeguarding their constitutional rights.

Thus, the correct answer highlights the provision for individuals to be advised of these important legal protections, which is a fundamental aspect of ensuring fair treatment under the law during custodial interrogations. The other options, while related to legal rights, do not directly pertain to the specific rulings and implications of the Miranda case. The right to a trial by jury, being released on bail, and the right to an attorney after conviction each address different legal processes and rights that are not the primary focus of the Miranda decision.