Which of the following best describes 'reasonable suspicion'?

The description of 'reasonable suspicion' is best represented by solid, articulate facts indicating possible illegal activity. This legal standard requires law enforcement officers to have specific, articulable facts that, when considered collectively, would lead a reasonable officer to suspect that a person is involved in criminal activity. This goes beyond mere intuition or personal belief and relies on observable behavior, circumstances, or information from credible sources.

For example, if an officer observes a person engaging in behavior typically associated with drug dealing, such as frequent short meetings with different individuals in a known drug area, these facts can form the basis of reasonable suspicion. This standard is crucial as it protects individual rights while allowing law enforcement to address potential criminal behavior effectively. It aligns with the legal framework designed to balance the need for police action and the protection of personal freedoms.

Other options fail to meet the legal threshold required for reasonable suspicion; personal beliefs without evidence and intuitive feelings are too vague and subjective, while assumptions based on community rumors lack the necessary factual basis to justify any police action.